Any
inaccurate points made in this article does not make the entire
thing (or parts) any less true.

It has been said that:
1/
"the human genome contains 223 genes that do not have the required predecessors
on the genomic evolutionary tree."
"At a relatively recent time as Evolution goes, modern humans acquired an
extra 223 genes not through gradual evolution, not vertically on the Tree of
Life, but horizontally, as a sideways insertion of genetic material from bacteria…"
"The difference between Man and Chimpanzee is fewer than 300 genes... So,
223 genes is more than two thirds of the difference between me, you and a chimpanzee!"
"These 223 genes include not only proteins involved in important physiological
but also psychiatric functions. Moreover, they are responsible for important
neurological enzymes that stem only from the mitochondrial portion of the DNA – the
so-called “Eve” DNA that humankind inherited only through the mother-line,
all the way back to a single “Eve.” That finding alone raises doubt
regarding that the "bacterial insertion" explanation."
"It is not clear whether the transfer was from bacteria to human or from
human to bacteria"
It has also been suggested that the gap from present day man, back to the closest
non human relative, is the largest 'missing link' in any family tree.
(Does this suggest that Humans have genes that are not of this earth? If so,
where do they come from?)
2/
"Humans seem weaker, mo /re susceptible to, more diseases,
not as healthy a gene pool... compared to naturally breed animals."
Is this because of a tight bottleneck in the genepool (tiny genepool) early
on in their evolution, or have the extra genes been added from a source that
has some weaknesses or is itself "inbred" to some degree? (the source
may have a tiny genepool)
3/
"It has been suggested (by geneticist Bruce Lahn) that humans genes have
come from more than one source... Perhaps even more than two. He suggested that
a new variant of the gene microcephalin (which is involved in human cognition)
appeared within our branch of the human tree about 40,000 years ago, and is so
different from the older version, that he suggests must have diverged originally
from our branch at least 1 million years ago, and rejoined due to crossbreeding
with Neanderthals."
I would like to suggest that the cognitive gene (one that makes the modern
human brain so different), came from a source other than the intellectually
inferior Neanderthal.
Notes:
"Todays humans evolved/appeared about 170,000 years ago
(earliest Eve directly related to us)
Earliest Y chromosomes
with same origin from about 100,000 years ago
(first Adam directly related to us)
Most genes come from these
comparatively short term origins... however there are some exceptions.
PDHA1 gene diverged from
our ancestors 1.8 million years ago, and then again 200,000 years
ago
RRM2P4 gene diverged about 2 million years ago...
(Asian branch of Homo erectus)
Humans have two basic
lineages, one sharing a common ancestor 200,000 years ago, and
another with a common ancestor 1.8 million years ago."

Sumerian
/ Planet X
I came across this:
"The Sumerian cuneiform deciphering skills of Zecharia Sitchin,
a linguist in command of many ancient languages who has set the
scientific world on its ear with his astounding interpretations
of ancient writings."
Sitchin has been deciphering 6000 year old cuniform tablets and
sumerian clay cylinders from mesopotamia : persian gulf : iraq.
His translations are proving to be remarkable:
The Sumerians had a good understanding of our solar system...
the planets sizes, positions, colours etc. Except that they also
include an extra planet called Niribu (translated into the crossing
planet, or planet of the cross) and symbolised as a cross in the
sky.
And they count Earth in from the outside of the solar system,
not out from the Sun. In other words, Earth is not measured as
the 3rd rock from the Sun, but from an external point of view.
If this planet is real, how can we not know about it?
It is known that the outer planets of our solar system do not
follow the predicted path that they should when calculated with
the known mass of the planets. This suggests that there is more
unidentified mass towards the outer edge of the solar system.
In other words, one (or more) quite sizable extra planet. The
missing planet has been called "Planet X".
Most of the planets in our solar system rotate about the Sun in
a near circular orbit on a (mostly) flat plane, however the extra
planet (Planet X) has an extremely elongated (comet like) orbit
traveling from a very long way out beyond the known solar system,
in to between the Earth and Mars orbits. And the plane of the
orbit is near right angles to the other planets orbits, coming
in beneath the plane of the other planets orbit, and going out
above the plane. Only the nearest curve of its orbit is visible
by eye from earth, appearing as a faint red star to the south
(near the southern cross) at its closest appearing larger than
the moon, and disappearing in the north skies.
It has been suggested that the sumerians called it the 'crossing
planet', because it crossed the path of the other planets, however
I believe they called it the 'planet of the cross' because that
it where they first saw it coming from. In or near the Southern
Cross.
The planets orbit is 3600 years long, and it is about 5 times
the size of Earth.
The planet is well known to many ancient cultures, but we have long forgotten
it.
The Sumerians call the planet Niribu (the crossing planet) (and they symbolised
it as a cross in the sky)
The Egyptians call it The Destroyer
The Mayans call it the Red Comet and built their calendar around its return.
In the Bible in Revelations, it is called Wormwood
We now call it Planet X, but I imagine we will find another name for it in
time.
The Sumerians version of the "Creation of Mankind" and of "Earth" itself,
is very interesting, being directly connected to Niribu (the planet of the
cross)
Remember, this was carved in stone, 4000 yrs BC.

Creation
of Earth:
Many millions of years ago, a planet called Tiamat used to orbit further
out where the asteroid belt now is.
According to the Sumerians, before Earth existed as we know it, Planet X
collided with Tiamat and tore a huge chunk off it.
The result was:
Tiamat became a smaller planet (now known as Earth) and was
pushed into a much smaller orbit, closer to the Sun.
The rubble that makes up the asteroid belt.
And the formation of Earths Moon.
Earth:
If you look at the reason
behind Earths continental drift, you will see that all the continents
used to be joined together on one side of the planet. One side
of Earth was land, the rest was water. What you are looking
at is half a planet, trying to be a whole planet.
When Planet X collided with Earth, it shattered the outer shell,
sent millions of tiny pieces into space. A large chunk of earth
and some of planet X broke loose and reformed as a semi molten
mass going into orbit around what remained of Earth.
The molten core of Earth reformed as a smaller sphere, the outer
shattered shell peices separated from each other and the waters
rushed around (towards what is now the pacific ocean) to balance
the planet.
Some of the larger Continents have large rivers feeding from
one side to the other... this shows that some of the continents
are tilted, one side high, the other low, like the broken bits
of a large shell trying to fit onto a smaller egg. Ever since
then, the spinning of the Earth has caused the continents to
continue moving away from each other, towards the pacific, attempting
to be evenly spaced, to try to even out and balance the planet.
Moon:
Earths Moon is the only
orbiting body that continually faces one of its sides towards
the object it orbits around. This is unusual. There can only
really be three possible reasons for this:
One: Coincidence. The rate of its orbit around our earth matches
exactly it's rate of spin, and always has done, purely by chance.
(This is unlikely)
Two: It has been artificially adjusted, as if by some alien
hand, intentionally, for an unknown purpose.
(This is also unlikely)
Three: One side of the moon is heavier than the other. If it
is made up of material from earth, and Planet X (a much larger
and therefore denser planet) then this is very likely.
As far as I see it... this is almost proof in itself that the
moon was made from two different sources.
(There is another possibility as suggested by some: Tidal friction.
This could slow or effect the spin of orbiting objects that
have partially liquid masses. However it shouldn't make the
rate of spin any less than the speed of the tides. in other
words... there should still be a slow but noticeable moon spin
as the tides keep dragging on the moon)
Life:
Planet X caused the creation
of the Moon.
The Moon in turn created the tides in Earths Oceans by the pull
of its gravity.
The tides created an area of constant cyclic change between high
and low tide around every land mass on Earth.
This narrow band of constant cyclic change created conditions
perfect for the first life on Earth.
Whether life was created naturally from the repeating chemical
changes, or was seeded there from some meteoritic source, this
was likely to be the first life on Earth. (Unless some basic life
survived from before the planets collision, but this is unlikely,
because before the moon, life was much less likely to have evolved.)

Effects
from Niribu/Planet X:
Niribu will not collide with Earth again.
Earth is now in a different smaller orbit, closer to the Sun,
and Niribu has made well over a million orbits since the collision
and has not hit us since.
However it doesn't have to hit us to cause some concern.
Depending on where Earth is in its orbit when Niribu comes by,
it will make a huge difference to what effect it might have on
us, if any.
Effect:
The last time it came
by was documented in the Bible in Exodus when it talks of the
plagues.
Note:
An important ingredient in the creation of life is phosphorous... and
yet Earth does not naturally have any phosphorous.
All phosphorus on Earth comes from meteorites.
Meteorites also contain Iron. Iron in water turns red.
Swarms of Meteorites falling into the rivers and seas would turn the
rivers blood red, create massive algal blooms that would saturate them
with life, to the point where they would poison themselves with their
own wastes. (plague of frogs that die)
more...
Effect:
The previous time was
Noah's flood.
Until we know exactly how close it will pass we cannot know the effect it
might have on us.
The effects might be anything from Nothing... to Lightning Storms, Solar
Flares, EarthQuakes, Volcanoes, Raining Meteorites, and High Tides.
It is likely that during Noahs Flood, that Niribu passed very close... close
enough for its huge gravitational force to pull on the waters of Earth, so
that as it approached from the south, the southern oceans gradually became
deeper and deeper until most of the planets water was in the southern hemisphere,
and all the southern lands were submerged. Then as the planet passed by and
left towards the north, all the waters rushed towards the northern hemisphere,
flattening everything in its path.
The planet should be visible for up to a year before and after its closest
point to Earth, and detectable up to 2 years either way.
Creation
of Man:
How did the sumerians know all this? Well this is where the story
gets just a little bit weirder.
They believed that the Gods came from Niribu. Whenever the planet
came close to earth, they would visit.
(The gods were blue eyed, pale skinned, red haired. The males
were bearded. This description was written as if these features
were not the norm for humans.)
The story tells of how a small hand-full of 'Gods' came to earth
on a rescue mission. The atmosphere on their planet was dying,
and apparently it could be repaired somehow with gold. A lot of
gold.
They found that they didn't have the numbers to mine large quantities
of such a heavy metal, so one of the gods (a female who specialised
in genetic manipulation) created some helpers. (Her symbol was
two snakes entwined, very much like todays medical symbol, except
that it had what looked like the rungs of a ladder between the
two snakes. Her symbol was basically our symbol for DNA.) She
took dna from the gods and added it to the local simians making
them more in her own image. The first human had organs missing,
the second had limbs missing, the next was perfect, so she made
a thousand of them, and they were all male, and it was good. They
became the workforce to mine the gold.
So as not to have to keep making humans to replace the damaged
ones, she created the first female, and allowed them to create
their own replacements.
more...
Angels
or Devils?:
I have just come up with an idea, and as far as I can tell this
hasn't been thought of anywhere else yet. but it does seem
to tie together many of the threads of this story, and makes
sense.
The Gods were often show in, or having come, from a winged or horned
disk.
it is very easy to assume that the sumerians were maybe trying
to depict the way that the gods were first seen, in flying disks,
or ufo's. However I have another suggestion.
The winged or horned
disk is a description of the coming planet. a description of its
mood.
Is the coming planet a
reason to celebrate or be afraid? Will the planet be good or
evil?
Why have we linked 'Winged Gods' to a feeling of being saved, and 'Horned
Gods' to living hell and damnation? why are Angels, and Sons of
God often shown with Halos?
There has been mention (from some sources) of fire raining
from the skies, of the planet being bombarded by millions
of flaming rocks etc. This suggests that Niribu may have
swarms of asteroids traveling with it. My suggestion is that
Niribu is a ringed planet just like Saturn, Uranus, Jupiter
and Neptune.
When the planet is first seen as it approaches us, it is
coming up from the south. We are looking down on it.
Imagine, as it comes closer we are able to see a large ring around
it. It is tipped slightly downwards so that the ring is seen
from an oblique angle.

Planet X with Halo: left - Horned, right - Winged
(I have been toying with
the idea of the Horned/Winged effect being caused by shadows,
but have decided that the most likely cause for the effect is
something else.)
Rings (halos) around planets are not always even.
The unevenness of Niribu's rings are most likely caused by another
planet (possibly even Earth) having passed through the plain
of the rings, removing a huge section of them. Leaving the rings
with a gap in them.
1. If the gap is facing away from us when the planet passes by,
it will appear to have horns, and the chances of us being bombarded
with millions of flaming rocks, boiling skies, Hell on Earth,
becomes a huge possibility. The Horned planet will become the
most feared symbol of all time.
2. If the gap is facing towards us when the planet passes us
by, it will appear to have wings, and since the debris has been
cleared from the closer side of the planet, it will be relatively
safe to pass through.
If there is any truth to the Sumarians story of the Gods coming
from Niribu, then this 'Winged' planet could symbolise the greatest
time in our recorded (and translated) history, the
meeting of our Creators, the second coming, the sons of god visiting
Earth, and angels from heaven.
We will know one way or another in 3 - 4 yrs.
Kolbrin
Bible
more...
Original
sin?
along with the knowledge of 'fortelling what may come'. Comes
the fear of knowing.
more...
Holy
blood:
if there is a blood line following on after jesus, why is it so
important to protect/preserve it?
Unless the bloodline is of the Alien Anunaki a dying race that
once created us.
more...
If
humans are all half-breeds, half simian half god, then gods could
appear to be similar enough to humans to almost pass as one, except
that in the same way that races look different, a god would look
different.
If jesus was a halfbreed... half god, half human, (son of God
and Mary)... did he look different from the others around him?
(red hair, blue eyes, pale skin, beard) did he stand out?
Compared to the dark haired brown eyed locals... did he appear
to glow? is that why he was often shown with a halo?
more...

2012:
• In 2012, asteroid 2004MN4 comes into view again to recalculate odds of
impact.
• January 31 — 433 Eros, the second largest Near Earth Object on record
(size 13x13x33 km) is expected to pass Earth at 0.1790 astronomical units (~16.647
Million Miles) (1 AU – about 93 million miles – is the average distance
from Earth to the sun). NASA studied Eros in the NEAR Shoemaker probe launched
February 2000.
• A Russian scientist named, Khabibullo Abdusamatov predicts the Earth will
enter a stage of cooling between 2012–2015 and the little ice age will
be similar to that of the one in the 1300s-1700s. The cooling will peak around
2055-2066.
• NASA predicts that the Sun will also reverse its own magnetic poles during
2012 as result of reaching the end of current 11-year sunspot cycle. Some believe
this will amplify the effects of retarding magnetic field on earth, as harmful
charged particles blasted away from the sun would more easily penetrate the earth's
atmosphere.
• December 21 — The Mesoamerican Long Count calendar, notably used
by the Maya civilization among others of pre-Columbian Mesoamerica, completes
its thirteenth b'ak'tun cycle since the calendar's mythical starting point (equivalent
to 3114 BC August 11 in the proleptic Gregorian calendar, according to the "GMT-correlation" JDN=
584283). The Long Count b'ak'tun date of this starting point (13.0.0.0.0) is
repeated, for the first time in a span of approximately 5,125 solar years. The
significance of this period-ending to the pre-Columbian Maya themselves is unclear,
and there is an incomplete inscription (Tortuguero Stela 6) which records this
date. It is also to be found carved on the walls of the Temple of Inscriptions
in Palenque, where it functions as a base date from which other dates are computed.
However, it is conjectured that this may represent in the Maya belief system
a transition from the current Creation world into the next. The December solstice
for 2012 also occurs on this day.
• December 23 — The alternative date for the completion of the thirteenth
b'ak'tun cycle in the Maya calendar, using a version of the GMT-correlation based
on a JDN of 584285 (a.k.a. the "Lounsbury correlation"), which is supported
by a smaller number of Mayanist researchers.
• October
18 - at 20:36 (Eastern Daylight Time) October 19 — at
1:36 GMT,, the Earth will be home to 7 billion, according to
the US Census Bureau.
• June
6 - Second and last solar transit of the planet Venus of this
century; the next pair is predicted to occur in 2117 and 2125
(see Transit of Venus, 2012).
 2012 is sometimes claimed
to be a year of spiritual transformation (or apocalypse). Many
esoteric sources interpret the completion of the thirteenth B'ak'tun
cycle in the Long Count of the Maya calendar (which occurs on
December 21 by the most widely held correlation) to mean there
will be a major change in world order, although there is a distinct
lack of evidence from the extant records of the pre-Columbian
Maya civilization that they themselves considered this occurrence
in 2012 would signify end of the world.
Accordingly, several eclectic authors claim that a major, world-changing event
will take place in 2012:
• The 1995 book The Mayan Prophecies linked the Maya calendar with long-period
sunspot cycles.
• The book 2012:Mayan Year of Destiny claims the Maya may have been instructed
in their wisdom by discarnate entities from Orion and the Pleiades. Contact was
maintained through shamanic rituals conducted in accordance with the movements
of planets and stars.
• The 1997 book The Bible Code claims that, according to certain algorithms
of the Bible code, a meteor, asteroid or comet will collide with the Earth.
• The book The Nostradamus Code speaks of a series of natural disasters
caused by a comet (possibly as above) which will allow the third anti-christ
to disperse his troops around the globe under the guise of aid in preperation
for a nuclear war.
• The book The Orion Prophecy claims that the Earth's magnetic field will
reverse.
Other
prophecies and apopolyptic writings and hypotheses for this
year include:
• Terence McKenna's mathematical novelty theory predicts a point of singularity
in which humankind will go through a great shift in consciousness.
• The Prophecy of the Popes, attributed to Saint Malachy, speculated that
Pope Benedict XVI would reign during the beginning of the tribulation of which
Jesus spoke, and sometime later a future pope described in the prophecy as "Peter
the Roman", the last in this prophetic list, would appear, bringing as a
result the destruction of the city of Rome and the Last Judgement.
• Many new age spiritualists and philosophers ("new-agers") believe
humankind will enter an age of enlightenment in 2012. There are a range of varying,
generally positive, beliefs shared by a subset of spiritualists from the mundane
to exceptional -- including a positive social shift and age of peace, mankind
becoming psychic and connected by a collective, and/or an evolution of the human
race into non-corporeal beings made of "spiritual" energy, or light
energy. An alternative view is that we are already thought-forms (see also idealism)
and will be realizing our true selves in this year.
• Some alien-enthusiasts, along with some new-agers, believe 2012 to correspond
approximately with the return of alien "watchers" or "caretakers" who
might have helped the first human civilizations with developing their technology
and may have been waiting for us to reach a higher level of technological and/or
social advancement. Beliefs range from the extra-terrestrials having benevolent
purposes -- such as to help human society evolve -- to malevolent purposes --
such as enslavement of mankind and/or manipulation.
• The ascetic Buddhist monk Ram Bahadur Bomjon reportedly told his followers
that he will return around 2012.
• Some proponents of a peak oil catastrophe place major events in 2012.
Richard C. Duncan's book The Peak of World Oil Production and the Road To The
Olduvai Gorge claims that the Olduvai cliff will begin and permanent blackouts
will occur worldwide. Several studies predict a peak in oil production in or
around 2012.

The last solar cycle was in 2001. Each active solar cycle has a period when
the flares are strongest, usually happening near the solar equator, called
the "solar maximum." This is significant because the next "solar
maximum" event will coincide with December 21, 2012.
The Galactic Alignment of December 21, 2012
Our solar system is part of a huge disc shaped collection of
stars and planets called the Milky Way. We're located somewhere
on the edge of the disc, slightly on top of the narrow disc.
But very soon we'll be moving to the bottom of the disc. This
change, from top to bottom, begins on December 21, 2012.
Yes, that's right. On the same day when our Sun is at it's solar maximum, something
will happen that's never happened before -- the ecliptic of our solar system
will intersect with the Galactic plane, called the "Galactic Equator" of
the Milky Way! [see star chart]
If you imagine our solar system as a bunch of peas on a plate, with a huge
meatball in the center, imagine the Milky Way as a city-size pizza with the "Guiness
World Book Record Meatball" in its center!
Prior to December 2012 we have been drifting on the top of the pizza, never
really able to see the bottom. The plate and pizza are not parallel. They are
moving at different angles. We've been drifting down, down, down... and on
December 21st, 2012, we will be exactly level with the crust -- forming an "x" at
the Galactic Equator where galactic gravity is the strongest. After 2012, if
we are still here, we will be passing through the bottom zone, viewing the
Milky Way pizza from the South.
Yes, there's even more!
By some amazing coincidence,
not only will we be intersecting with the Galactic Equator, but
we will be doing this precisely aligned with the center of the
Galaxy where there is maximum mass! More mass means more gravity.
More gravity means more influence from those barycenters in our
Sun. That means exponential increases in solar disruptions --
all coinciding on the same day! Whew!
|