I'm writing this because I noticed that a lot of the ideas that I used to have...

...I have long forgotten.

So before I lose any more... I will try to get them all written down.

 

 

Ideaz: Pg 1

All the Ideas on this page are list in the menu at the bottom right of this window.

Cick on any topic that interests you to jump straight to that idea.

​

 

For these Ideaz, Click here to go to Page 2

Matter Transfer - Invisibility - Travel - Philosophy - Brain - Artificial Memory- Telepathy - Devolution - 

Ghosts - Predictions  - Time Fibres - Artificial Intelligence - Vector Gods - Rogue Time

 

 

For these Ideaz, Click here to go to Page 3

Evolution - Universal Edge - Time Bubble - Speed of Time - Falling into a blackhole - Instant space travel - 

Time Slippage - SPACE SUCKS Alternate BIG BANG theory - Was the World Larger? - Moon - Black Holes - 

Elastic Time - Ripples in Time - Tacking in Time - Leaning into Time - Fictional Alien Time. - Origins of "Embarrassment" 

Concept for story - Ring Modular Personal Assistant - Can we see Black-Holes? - Older nerve structure

 

 

SteamPunk, Jules Verne and Flash Gordon didn't paint a
very historically correct portrait of the Future.

But they are still worth remembering for their style and forward thinking.

It is for the same reason that I remember these,

the Ideas from my very young Dragon self. 

 The earliest recollection of My Junior Dragon thoughts were ideas like:

Comparisons between Atoms and Solar Systems,

triggering thoughts of Huge Universe sized life forms. 

And God potentially being a Race of people,

with Heaven being their home planet.

And of course, Perpetual Motion Machines.

​

I have always believed that...

"Anything is possible... and nothing is a fact."

and... "The best Ideas will come from those who don't know any better"

​

Time: (4thD)

Before the beginning of Time -was the end: 

Big Bang... The universe was created at the beginning of time (as we know it). But just before that... was the tail end of an implosion of the previous universe. The creation of our universe was the latest, Mother of all Whiteholes preceded by its Parent, the Father of all Blackholes. This cycle repeats over and over endlessly. Creation of Universe (MoAWH's), expansion of young Universe (where we are now), middle-aged Universe (maximum expansion... where universal gravity takes over from initial inertia), Old Universe (Universe shrinking), Death of Universe (FoABH's). 

There are two major differences between a black hole, and the end of the universe (other than size). 

1 A black hole lives for a long time... (probably until the end of the universe.) Between the end of the Universe and the creation of the next is close to an infinitely short time. 

2 A black hole has hyperdense material at its center. 

Between the end of one universe and the next, for a split second, all the Mass of that universe passes through ONE point at the same time and has NO Mass!. 

Only pure Inertia. 

Then continues on out to become the next universe. We may never know.. there may be many universes at any one time.. possibly families of them... some may even overlap others.. who knows. 

 

Surviving the End of the Universe? 

At the end of the universe... all matter meets in one point (centre of the Universe) mostly at the same time.

That meeting starts with everything colliding, totally destroying all matter. Nothing survives! 
The Gravitational attraction is so strong.. nothing can escape. 

However... it may be possible to 'use' the attraction... instead of trying to avoid it... go with it. Use all possible energy to get to the center of the Universe BEFORE everything else. Quite a bit before everything else. That means traveling much faster than everything else! The inertia of this incredible speed may be strong enough to carry you through the center and out away from the attraction. 

As you pass through the centre.. all Universal mass will be surrounding you and shrinking towards you fast. the combined Gforces at this point will be zero. 

 

Obstacles 

There are two obstacles to this technique. 

First... if there is a planet already at the centre of the universe... it must be avoided! 

Even if this planet/star were VERY large or even a Blackhole, it's gravitational pull MAY be avoided, since its attraction could be counterbalanced by the huge sphere of the Universal mass shrinking behind you. 

Second... as you leave the center, the rest of the universe is still closing in fast. You must be far enough ahead of the universe following you that there are still gaps between the stars as you exit out through the other side of the universe shell. Gaps big enough to safely travel through, without changing directions too much. The resultant Gforces due to direction changes more than very minor, will not be survivable, unless the technology at this time has allowed the creation of a technique to compensate for this.

 

Alternative 'shell' ending to the Universe

It is possible that the speed and inertia of the universe imploding... may not be enough to pull everything back to/through the singular centerpoint. Instead, they may stop their path before the center when they all collide/meet at once creating a huge hollow sphere/shell around the universal center.

(They collide before they reach the center)

The Shell would have different layers of density. 

Starting at the outside smooth (slightly hilly) surface, (which would be as shiny as glass if it weren't made from a material at least as dense as that of a black hole). Xmass, Zero temp. (Can't reflect light). Towards halfway through the shell and it is still made of Xmass. 

At the time of impact (the coming together), the densest area would be halfway between the inner and outer surface of the shell. Almost immediately the outer half of the shell would compress down to a very thin infinitely strong armored layer. From the halfway point on to the inner surface of the shell, the density and pressure decreases. The inner surface may have soil, water, ice, etc...a full range of variables, more than found on earth. 

This will be an inverted planet of enormous scale! 

There will be an atmosphere with probably mostly hydrogen (and other Universally common gaseous elements at its most dense near the shell. Gravity is directed outwards from the center towards the shell.

The center of Gravity is evenly spread around the outer layer of the sphere.

The inner center point is probably very nearly a vacuum, and all huge gravitational pulls are counteracted. ZeroG. 

Because the outer shell is so well sealed, all energy is trapped inside never to escape. Since the outerlayer is very cold (Zero temp) the hottest area is probably a layer between the centerpoint and the inner surface. The center point, being a vacuum is therefore very cold.

Initially I imagined a very hot, dark, inverted world.

But on reconsidering, there is a Universal amount of energy trapped in the shell. So much that the hottest layers of gas will probably ignite. With time there will most likely be life developed in the sphere, since it includes heat, light, water, cold, however it does not include gravitational changes due to planets etc. No tides.. and comparably very little change. Change is an important ingredient for life.

Due to the enormous size of the sphere.. there will be variable weather patterns under the flaming sky, but they won't follow long regular patterns as they do on planets. No day and night. All change will be determined by the FireStorms in the inner sky, and their interactions with the outer surface. 

 

Alternative Alternative shell ending: 

Or... With the tremendous energy so far unaccounted for... that must be expelled as around half the universe or more changes from a solid state (or higher) to an Xmass state. We have the potential for an enormous explosion! delema... 

unfinished more to add...

...most of that energy is from the outer half of the sphere. anything on the outside will be attracted and compressed.. but this is energy... not mass.. so... hmmmmm... 

 

The Shape of Time 

The 3Ds of Time

Imagine a trumpet bell or conical flare pointing into the future from the present. The wide open end of the flare is the distant (unpredictable) future.

The narrowest point is now. Now has no width at all. There is no width in the model because we cannot move sideways in time. 

The distant future has width to allow for the various possible futures. The further into the future... the more unpredictable and variable the possibilities are. 

 

Predicting the Future 

The future is predictable. It CAN be predicted... but more by exclusion than by any fortune telling means. 

What I mean is... it is relatively easy to predict what WON'T happen. Though... the further into the future one looks... the harder/more unreliable this becomes. e.g.: I can state as a fact You are NOT going to be struck by an Aeroplane in the next 5 seconds.

(If I am wrong, Ooops, I apologies)

However, for every 5 secs that one looks further into the future.. that certainty becomes progressively less concrete... until you reach a point where you just cannot exclude that possible future.

Random future prediction:
atom chemical reaction
predicting individual human actions is as difficult as predicting where a particular electron is at any particular time... however, knowing how a chemical (made up of electrons) will react is relatively simple, (it follows rules)... so, I surmise that knowing how a group of people will react in future situations should be as predictable, once the rules are learned.

 

The Inertia of Time 

This flared cone of possible futures resembles the variable trajectory paths of bullets fired into the future. Or any object, with Mass and Inertia. It is because of this identical match of model shapes, that I suggest that Time has Inertia... (and possibly Mass). 

Either that.. or the way we interact with time has the resultant effect of emulating Inertia... in that time has a tendency to continue doing what it is already doing... travelling at full force towards the future. 

 

The Reflection of time 

If the Time Inertia model works... then I suggest there needs to be an additional identical cone attached to the first. As if in a mirror image.. the second cone flares off into our past.

So we now have a Future and Past cone, touching their sharpest of singular points... now. 

As we continue to travel into the future... we take the model with us... so that we are ALWAYS now. This model suggests something perhaps odd. It suggests multiple pasts! 

Well, we already know of the multiple versions of the past. 

All versions of History, are merely an idea of the past.. a guess... In most if not all cases... a lie. 

This however is something quite different again from what the model is suggesting... and as yet I haven't quite worked out a satisfactory reason/explanation for the multifarious pasts.

(Maybe the reason we remember slightly different pasts is that we actually came from different pasts?) 

 

Fullspeed backwards 

One model for looking at time travel... (as in the way we all travel along/with it...)

... is to imagine a vehicle in which we R all traveling, flatout, facing backwards... 

only able to see where we have been, not where we are going. 

This is generally regarded as not such a good way to travel. 

However, we all seem to treat/accept this as normal, when travelling the road of time. 

If for some reason we were forced to travel all vehicles in such a manner... we would very quickly have developed some way of seeing out the back of the vehicle... (the direction of travel) either with mirrors or video camera and screen etc. 

Why then do we not attempt the same with Time?

If, in our 'backwardly travelling vehicle, mirrors and cameras were impossible... we would either attempt to stop the vehicle, or calculate (guess)/predict what we may be about to travel into... or pretend it isn't happening and close our eyes/minds to the idea. 

If we were to try to predict what we may be about to travel into... we would need to use our knowledge of where we had been (the past).

If the vehicle seems to have been traveling down a road or rail, then one may predict a slightly higher chance of the road/rail continuing off into our future. (no change... more of the same.. safe.. predictable... boring).

Sooner or later one may expect a bend ahead. This is change, relatively unpredictable, ...

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

Relative Time 

Time appears to travel faster or slower, depending on the Age of traveller. 

This is because we judge everything based on our own experience (what we know). 

For a 'Six year old'... One year is a very long time... because it is One sixth of its entire Life (Knowledge/Memory Length). 

For a 'Sixty year old'... One year is a very short time... because it is One sixtieth of its entire Life (Knowledge/Memory Length)! 

 

From Zero to the Speed of Time... ...in a Lifetime 

Start standing still

From the time when one has the first feelings of self... (first memories)... (this may even be prebirth)... till the last breath... they spend the entire time, catching up with time, (the relative speed of time).

Is time moving... or is it just us.. moving along it?

If we assume that time is moving... then it must have a speed. This is the speed of time. 

If it is stationary... and only we move along it... then we must have a speed. 

I believe that each person has their own time, and their own speed... that varies throughout their life. Towards the younger years of their life... their personal time runs slower... towards the end of life, their personal time is at maximum speed. 

This would suggest... that at the extreme beginning of their personal time... time is practically standing still.

Personal Stationary Time would happen sometime between conception and first (cognitive) self awareness or memories. 

If one imagined Time as a great river... and each life, as a block of wood... dropped into the river. The Block will go from stationary... slowly speeding up... till eventually it reaches the speed of the great River itself. At which point... it would appear that we die. 

As a side issue, I believe that all mass is based around change. All our senses are designed by nature to detect change. Remove the change in a situation.... and it becomes undetectable. (from our point of view) 

While we (the block) travel along the river.. catching up to its (the Rivers) speed.. our mass is traveling slower than the rivers mass... therefore between the river and Block is a difference of speed... a friction... a point or source of change. Once this friction (change) is resolved... we cease to be noticed (exist) ... we die.. or at least, from our point of view, our senses stop detecting life.

This could be used to promote the idea of life after death... as yet... I am not a believer. 

 

To calculate the inertia of a life:

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

Tardis Factor: (5thD?)

Inside bigger than Outside Mass: (AllD) 

not practical... but possible

The faster something moves... the smaller it gets. As I understand it... Einstein said that.
If he is correct... then a double layered circular building could be designed...
The inner layer havingrobotisised framing that slides inside itself.
If the inner structure is mechanically expanded to compensate for the shrinking due to speed.
then the inner building will appear to grow.. as it speeds up... relative to any inner objects.

However.... due to the extreme G forces from the high speed spinning...
it is unlikely anything would survive inside.

and the expanded space is likely to be less than the structure allowing it to expand...

so.. it is unlikely to be of any value..... but you just never know =)

 

Mass:

Mass is purely energy (change):

I believe that Nature knows best ... (Im not saying that it cant be improved on.. but.)

All our senses detect only change... If a sound stops changing... we stop hearing it. If a texture stops moving... we stop feeling it... if a smell is constant... we don't notice it.. etc. This applies to all senses.

I believe there is a good reason for this.

The reason we only notice things when they change.. is because .. without any change... it ceases to be.

Now that sounds pretty radical. but that is because we judge everything by our own experience... and in Our experience.. nothing has ever ceased to change Totally... so it doesn't cease to be. 
It doesn't cease to beTotally... because of the greatest force of all... (possibly)... Inertia. 

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

States of Matter: 

In a Vacuum, there is no mass. 

In Plasma or Amass (this is what I call it), the electrons, protons etc have separated. No molecules exist. 

In Gas, electrons and protons have formed molecules. The molecules move freely. There are no bonds between molecules. 

In Liquid, molecules move relatively freely, though there are interactive bonding relationships between molecules. 

In a Solid, molecules are bound rigidly together. Interlocked. 

In Xmass (this is what I call it), (found in a singularity), the electrons, neutrons, etc of all atoms, have collapsed together forming the most solid mass of zero temperature. (From a Blackhole Core)

More dense than this? 

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

Black hole (Singularity) 

where does the energy go!?

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

Life of a Blackhole

Communication between BH's? 

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

Temp: 

Absolute Zero = Blackhole Singularity 

Heat = movement, vibration, friction. 
The more something is cooled (or normally compressed), the less movement there is. 
Electrons moving within their atom results in temperature (and size). Reducing thetemperature, reduces the amount of atomic movement. 
At absolute zero, there is no temperature.... therefore there is no atomic movement. Without atomic movement there is nothing to stop the negative electrons and positive protons being attracted towards each other. The Atom collapses with all the elements together, decreasing the size, maintaining the same gravity, increasing the density. The extremely dense atoms have a higher gravitational focus, and start to attract other atoms around them. 
A babyblackhole is born. 

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

The Shape of Earth 

When the earth was young, it was unbalanced, with all the land mass on one side. 
Like a spinning top, the wobble will have forced it to quickly turn till the land mass was at the top. Over time,the broken earths crust, (like dust on soapy water) gradually spread out, trying to evenly cover the globe.

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

Continental Drift

(unfinished... more to come).... 

 

 

Motors: 

Perpetual Motion energy source 

Let's see if I can describe this one in words, I'm doing this from memory:
The axis of this motor has a top and bottom end. Each end has asharp pointed magnet, Magnetic North pointing out. The points sit inside the Magnetic North end of a concave magnet. The concave magnets hold the inner pointed magnets in place without touching them. They repel each other.
The motor axis floats between the two repelling magnets.
With the magnet pointing north to north, the flux linerepel each other, so there are no flux linkages to make and break, therefore no magnetic resistance.
The entire motor sits inside a vacuum, therefore no air resistance.

The center axis has multiple thin arms radiating out, each with a node on the end.
The case of the motor is a large horseshoe magnet with a large plate on each arm, one north, one south, facing each other.
The center axis passes through a hole in the middle of both magnetic plates.

As the axis spins, the multiple arms cut through the large magnetic field between the two large plates, inducing a current along each arm. The electrons gather in the nodes at the end of each arm, creating a negative charge. (A surplus of electrons)

The large magnetic plates have multiple fingers reaching towards the inner arm nodes. On the end of each finger is a small sliver of an unstable element. (name unidentified at the moment)
This unstable element has no electrons in its outer valence layer, but needs them to balance the number of its protons, so it is made of positively charged atoms, attracting electrons, but does not keep them.

The negatively charged spinning arm nodes are attracted to the evenly spaced positively charged finger tips. Until they are close enough to discharge (arc across).

The electrical charge jumps from the arm nodes, to the finger tips, through the magnetic plates to an earth.

From another earth, a current is pulled up to one of the concave axis magnets, where it jumps the tiny gap to the inner axis and runs back out the radiating arms to replace the original charge that was moved by the spinning arms in the large magnetic field.

The faster the arms spin, the more current is sucked out of the earth, through the motor, and back to ground.

The arm nodes are continually pulled forward to the next finger tip, where their charge is lost, where inertia carries them onward, and a new charge is built up till the next finger tip. etc etc.

The Earth has an unlimited supply of surplus electrons, so this motor will keep accellerating until it blows itself apart!... It will need resistors or circuit breakers to keep its speed within limits.
And it needs to be worked with a load on it. Earth is an endlesspowersupply... This perpetual motor simply makes that power available to us. 

(unfinished... more to come)....

 

Water powered (implosion motor)

Existing motors are converted by adjusting timing and replacing carburettor 

Instead of petrol, split H2O into hydrogen and oxygen. 
Feed both H and O into (combustion) motor via a replaced gascarborator at a two to one ratio. Change the timing of the motor from: 
petrol in, compress, ignition, combustion expansion, remove waste products, 
to: 2x hydrogen and 1x Oxygen in, ignition, implosion compression, remove waste water. 

unfinished more to add... 

 

Of course... None of this is a Fact.

But some of it ... may just turn out to be ...

a Truth.